Start Your Idea

Agile Vs. Waterfall: Which Project Management Methodology Is Best For Your Team?

Agile and Waterfall are two well-known project management methodologies. Both of them are popular in software development but each is best suited for different types of projects. The main difference is that Waterfall is a linear system of working that requires the team to complete each project phase before moving on to the next one while Agile encourages the team to work simultaneously on different phases of the project.

Agile Methodology

Agile methodology was developed as a response to Waterfall’s more rigid structure. As a result, it’s a much more fluid form of project management. A software development project can take years to complete, and technology can change significantly during that time. Agile was developed as a flexible method that welcomes incorporating changes of direction even late in the process, as well as accounting for stakeholders’ feedback throughout the process.

In Agile, the team will work on phases of the project concurrently, often with short-term deadlines. Additionally, the team, rather than a project manager, drives the project’s direction. This can empower the team to be motivated and more productive, but also requires a more self-directed team.

Pros
Cons
Scrum can help teams complete project deliverables quickly and efficiently
Scrum often leads to scope creep, due to the lack of a definite end-date
Scrum ensures effective use of time and money
The chances of project failure are high if individuals aren't very committed or cooperative
Large projects are divided into easily manageable sprints
Adopting the Scrum framework in large teams is challenging
Developments are coded and tested during the sprint review
The framework can be successful only with experienced team members
Works well for fast-moving development projects
Daily meetings sometimes frustrate team members
The team gets clear visibility through scrum meetings
If any team member leaves in the middle of a project, it can have a huge negative impact on the project. Quality is hard to implement until the team goes through an aggressive testing process

Waterfall Methodology

Waterfall methodology is a linear form of project management ideal for projects where the end result is clearly established from the beginning of the project. The expectations for the project and the deliverables of each stage are clear and are required in order to progress to the next phase.

Pros
Cons
Uses clear structure
Makes changes difficult
Determines the end goal early
Excludes the client and/or end user
Transfers information well
Delays testing until after completion

Agile and Waterfall Comparison
Waterfall
Agile
Timeline
Waterfall has a fixed timeline. The idea is that the start and finish of the project are already mapped out from the beginning.
Agile is a lot more flexible and accounts for experimenting with different directions. Rather than a fixed timeline, the schedule adapts as the project progresses. The Agile Manifesto, an online document released in 2001 by a group of software developers, says team members are expected to, “​​Deliver working software frequently, from a couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a preference to the shorter timescale.”
Client Involvement
Once the end goal is established, Waterfall does not involve the client or project owner during the process, apart from specific check-ins or for deliverables. The course of the project is outlined from the start, so incorporating client feedback is not an ongoing part of the process.
A fundamental part of Agile is including clients in the project development at every step. The Agile Manifesto states, “Our highest priority is to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software.” Therefore, business owners are expected to be involved and give feedback to the software development team as they progress through the different phases of the project.
Flexibility
Waterfall is not as flexible as Agile because each phase needs to be fully completed before moving on to the next phase. The project is also planned out ahead of time, making this management system ideal for teams with a clear vision of where they are headed from start to finish.
Flexibility is built into the Agile method. Agile values short bursts of work, which are called sprints. The method welcomes adapting to different directions, incorporating new information even at a later stage of the project.
Budget
Fixed. The budget for projects using the Waterfall methodology is generally fixed. Because the project is determined from start to finish, there is less room to change the budget mid-project.
Flexible. Agile is open to adaptation, encourages experimentation and welcomes changes of direction, even in later phases of the project. Because of this, the budget tends to be more flexible.

Which project management methodology should you use?

Unsurprisingly, the answer to this question depends on your unique team and its aims. To help you decide, ask yourself these two questions.

What goals do I have for my team?

While each methodology has the same goal of project completion, their secondary aims make them truly distinct. Your goals can help you decide which methodology is the best fit for you.

Determine what you want most for your team. If you simply want to produce work faster, try Scrum. If you want to improve your production process, use Kanban. If your projects demand a linear workflow, implement Waterfall. If you’re not sure, explore other Agile options and ask yourself the next question.

Which methodology will we actually stick to?

The differences in project management methodologies only matter if you use the methodology consistently. Without WIP limits, for example, Kanban is just another complicated Agile methodology. And if you don’t keep your phases discrete when using Waterfall, then you might as well just use an Agile methodology.

As such, the best project management methodology for your team is the one you’ll execute perfectly. Using piecemeal parts of a methodology will only make you lose out on the benefits that popularized the methodology in the first place. So while you certainly can adapt methodologies for your team’s use, it’s best to use a methodology as intended, adjusting only as necessary.

25 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • All Posts
  • Digital transfomation
  • Technology stack
  • Working process
Load More

End of Content.

slitigenz logo

Follow Us On

Who We Are

Discover Our Roadmap

Meet Our Team

See How We Work

What We Do

IT Outsourcing

Offshore Development Center

Dedicated Team

Software Development

Freelancing Team

Updating Technologies

Big Data & Machine Learning

Blockchain

Cloud Computing

Our Creations

Sli Home

GazeCode

What We Offer

Our Deployments

Our Knowledge

en_USEnglish
viVietnamese en_USEnglish